«Выжидать и лавировать», или Кибернетическая правительность в консервативном стиле
Ключевые слова:
Правительность, консерватизм, либерализм, советская философия, кибернетика
Аннотация
Статья посвящена одному из аспектов истории советской правительности (gouvernementalité). Согласно Фуко, социализм не выработал собственной управленческой рациональности, и поэтому вынужден подключаться к ее уже готовым формам. Позднесоветская история во многом определяется противостоянием между двумя такими подключениями—к административно-полицейской форме и к либеральной. Если первое подключение хорошо известно, то второе только начинает всерьез изучаться. На примере кибер-управленческого проекта академика Никиты Моисеева автор показывает, как изменяются элементы либеральной «гувернементальности» и без того уже отмеченные «консервативным стилем» (Маннгейм), будучи пересаженными на советскую почву. Частичная децентрализация и рыночные механизмы становятся здесь элементами кибернетической мегамашины, где постоянно развивающиеся производительные силы—это лабильная функциональная часть системы, а производственные отношения—консервативная «архитектурная схема организации», отвечающая за самосохранение и стабильность. И консервативная «архитектура» системы должна быть установлена таким образом, чтобы прогрессирующее развитие не ставило под вопрос само существование бесконечно самонастраивающегося социалистического «автопилота».
Литература
Anderson, Perry (2005). Spectrum: From Right to the Left in the World of Ideas. NY-L.: Verso.
Bassin, Mark (2016). The Gumilev Mystique: Biopolitics, Eurasianism, and the Construc- tion of Community in Modern Russia (Culture and Society after Socialism). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Bikbov, Alexander (2014). Grammatika poryadka: Istoricheskaya sotsiologiya ponyatiy, kotoriye menyayut nashu realnost [The Grammar of the Order: A Historical So- ciology of the Concepts which Change Our Reality]. Мoscow: Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly economiki.
Bloor, David (2000). “Wittgenstein as a Conservative Thinker”. In The Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge, ed. Martin Kusch, 1-14. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bockman, Johanna (2011). Markets in the name of socialism: the left-wing origins of neoliberalism. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Bourke, Richard (2018). What is Conservatism? History, Ideology and Party // European Journal of Political Theory. 17.4: 449-475.
Burke, Edmund (2009). Reflections on the Revolution in France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Budraitskis, Ilya (2020). Мir, kotoriy postroil Hantington i v kotorom zhivyom vse my. Paradoksy konservativnogo povorota v Rossii [The World that Huntington Built and in which We All Live. Paradoxes of the Conservative Turn in Russia]. Мoscow: Izdatelstvo knizhnogo magazina “Tsiolkovskiy”.
Dean, Mitchell (2010) Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. London: Sage. Donzelot, Jacques, Colin Gordon (2008). “Governing Liberal Societies – the Foucault Effect in the English‐speaking World”. Foucault Studies. Vol. 5:48-62.
Eyal, Gil (2003). The Origin of Postcommunist Elites: From Prague Spring to the Breakup of Czechoslovakia. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Foucault, Michel (1971). The Order of Things. An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, Michel (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977-1978. London: Palgrave.
Foucault, Michel (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978-1979. London: Palgrave.
Glushenkova, Elena (2015). Ecopolitologiya N.N. Moiseyeva i ustoychivoye razvitiye Rossii [The Ecopolitical Thought of N. N. Moiseyev and the Sustainable Development of Russia]. Мoscow: Аcademiya MNEPU.
Gordon, Colin (1991). Governmental Rationality: An Introduction / The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality. Ed. by Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon and Peter Miller. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Graham, Loren (1987). Science, Philosophy, and Human Behavior in the Soviet Union, New York: Columbia University Press.
Huntington, Samuel P. (1957). Conservatism as an Ideology // American Political Science Review. 51(2):454-473.
Ionin, Leonid (2005). “Konservatizm” [Conservatism]. Logos. Vol. 3: 3-73.
Kamnev, Vladimir (2009). “Sovetskiy konservatizm kak filosofskaya problema” [Soviet Conservatism as a Philosophical Problem]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A. S. Pushkina. Vol. 3.1: 172-182.
Kaploon, Viktor (2019). “Perestat myslit “vlast” cherez “gosudastvo”. Gouvernamentalite, Governmentality Studies: chto stalo s analitikoy vlasti Mishelya Fuko v russkikh perevodakh.” [To Stop Thinking “Power” by Means of “Government”. Gou- vernamentalite, Governmentality Studies: What Happened to Michel Foucault’s Analytic of Power in Russian Translation.] Logos. Vol. 29.2:179-220.
Kobylin, Igor (2019) “‘Razum i rynok’: ecologicheskoye “upravlenchestvo” akademika Moiseyeva” [“‘Reason and Market’: Moiseyev’s ecological “adminstrativity”]. Neprikosnovenniy zapas. Vol.123.1: 144-160.
Kovda, Viktor (1952). Velikiy plan preobrazovaniya prirody [The Great Plan for the Transformation of Nature]. Мoscow: Izdaelstvo akademii Nauk SSSR.
Mannheim, Karl (1954) Diagnosis of Our Time: Wartime Essays of a Sociologist. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Minakov, Arkadiy (2011). Russkoy konservatizm v pervoy chetverti XIX veka [Russian Conservatism in the First Quarter of the XIX Century]. Voronezh: Izd-vo. Voronezhskogo gos. un-ta.
Moiseyev, Nikita (1984). Lyudi i kibernetika [People and Cybernetics]. Мoscow: Molodaya gvardiya.
Moiseyev, Nikita (2000). Sudba tsivilizatsii. Put razuma. [The Fate of Civilization. The Path of Reason.] Мoscow: Yazyki russkoy kultury.
Moiseyevskiye chteniya (2018). Moiseyevskiye chteniya. Kultura i gumanitarniye problemy sovremennoy tsivilizatsii. Vserossiyskaza nauchnaya konferentsiya. Doklady i materialy. [Moiseyev readings. Culture and Problems in the Humanities Pertinent to the Contemporary Civilization. All-Russian Scholarly Conference. Papers and Proceedings]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta.
Moiseyevskiye chteniya (2019). Moiseyevskiye chteniya. Kultura kak faktor natsionalnoy bezopasnosti Rossii. Obshсherossiyskaza (natsionalnaya) nauchnaya konferentsiya. Doklady i materialy. [Moiseyev readings. Culture as a Factor of Russia’s National Security. National Scholarly Conference. Papers and Proceedings]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta.
Moiseyevskiye chteniya (2020). Moiseyevskiye chteniya. Kultura i gumanitarniye prob- lemy sovremennoy tsivilizatsii. Obshсherossiyskaza (natsionalnaya) nauchnaya konferentsiya. Doklady i materialy. [Moiseyev readings. Culture and Problems in the Humanities Pertinent to the Contemporary Civilization. National Scholarly Conference. Papers and Proceedings]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta.
Muller, Jerry Z., ed. (1997). Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Oakeshott, Michael (1962). Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, London: Methuen and co ltd.
Peters, Benjamin (2016). How Not to Network a Nation: The Uneasy History of the Soviet Internet. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Repnikov, Alexander (2007). Konservativniye kontseptsii pereustroystva Rossii [Conservative Conceptions of Russia’s Reconstruction]. Мoscow: Academia.
Rindzeviciute, Egle (2015). The Future as an Intellectual Technology in the Soviet Union. From Centralised Planning to Reflexive Management // Cahiers du Monde russe. Vol. 56.1: 111-134.
Rindzeviciute, Egle (2016). The Power of Systems: How Policy Sciences Opened Up The Cold War World. Ithaca; L.: Cornell University Press.
Rindzeviciute, Egle (2020). “Soviet Policy Sciences and Earth System Governmental- ity”. Modern Intellectual History. Vol. 17.1.: 179-208.
Shchedrovitskiy, Georgiy (2003). Metodologiya i filosofiya organizatsionno-upravlencheskoy deyatelnosti: osnovniye ponyatiya i printsipy (kurs lektsiy) [Methodology and Philosophy of Organizational-administrative Action: Fundamental Concepts and Principles (lecture course)]. Vol. 5. Moscow: ORU.
Thompson, Willie (2011). Ideologies in the Age of Extremes: Liberalism, Conservatism, Communism, Fascism 1914-91. NY: Pluto Press.
Walicki, Andrzej (1964). W kręgu konserwatywnej utopii. Struktura i przemiany rosyjskiego słowianofilstwa, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Bassin, Mark (2016). The Gumilev Mystique: Biopolitics, Eurasianism, and the Construc- tion of Community in Modern Russia (Culture and Society after Socialism). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Bikbov, Alexander (2014). Grammatika poryadka: Istoricheskaya sotsiologiya ponyatiy, kotoriye menyayut nashu realnost [The Grammar of the Order: A Historical So- ciology of the Concepts which Change Our Reality]. Мoscow: Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly economiki.
Bloor, David (2000). “Wittgenstein as a Conservative Thinker”. In The Sociology of Philosophical Knowledge, ed. Martin Kusch, 1-14. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bockman, Johanna (2011). Markets in the name of socialism: the left-wing origins of neoliberalism. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Bourke, Richard (2018). What is Conservatism? History, Ideology and Party // European Journal of Political Theory. 17.4: 449-475.
Burke, Edmund (2009). Reflections on the Revolution in France. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Budraitskis, Ilya (2020). Мir, kotoriy postroil Hantington i v kotorom zhivyom vse my. Paradoksy konservativnogo povorota v Rossii [The World that Huntington Built and in which We All Live. Paradoxes of the Conservative Turn in Russia]. Мoscow: Izdatelstvo knizhnogo magazina “Tsiolkovskiy”.
Dean, Mitchell (2010) Governmentality: power and rule in modern society. London: Sage. Donzelot, Jacques, Colin Gordon (2008). “Governing Liberal Societies – the Foucault Effect in the English‐speaking World”. Foucault Studies. Vol. 5:48-62.
Eyal, Gil (2003). The Origin of Postcommunist Elites: From Prague Spring to the Breakup of Czechoslovakia. Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press.
Foucault, Michel (1971). The Order of Things. An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Pantheon Books.
Foucault, Michel (2007). Security, Territory, Population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977-1978. London: Palgrave.
Foucault, Michel (2008). The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978-1979. London: Palgrave.
Glushenkova, Elena (2015). Ecopolitologiya N.N. Moiseyeva i ustoychivoye razvitiye Rossii [The Ecopolitical Thought of N. N. Moiseyev and the Sustainable Development of Russia]. Мoscow: Аcademiya MNEPU.
Gordon, Colin (1991). Governmental Rationality: An Introduction / The Foucault Effect. Studies in Governmentality. Ed. by Graham Burchell, Colin Gordon and Peter Miller. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Graham, Loren (1987). Science, Philosophy, and Human Behavior in the Soviet Union, New York: Columbia University Press.
Huntington, Samuel P. (1957). Conservatism as an Ideology // American Political Science Review. 51(2):454-473.
Ionin, Leonid (2005). “Konservatizm” [Conservatism]. Logos. Vol. 3: 3-73.
Kamnev, Vladimir (2009). “Sovetskiy konservatizm kak filosofskaya problema” [Soviet Conservatism as a Philosophical Problem]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A. S. Pushkina. Vol. 3.1: 172-182.
Kaploon, Viktor (2019). “Perestat myslit “vlast” cherez “gosudastvo”. Gouvernamentalite, Governmentality Studies: chto stalo s analitikoy vlasti Mishelya Fuko v russkikh perevodakh.” [To Stop Thinking “Power” by Means of “Government”. Gou- vernamentalite, Governmentality Studies: What Happened to Michel Foucault’s Analytic of Power in Russian Translation.] Logos. Vol. 29.2:179-220.
Kobylin, Igor (2019) “‘Razum i rynok’: ecologicheskoye “upravlenchestvo” akademika Moiseyeva” [“‘Reason and Market’: Moiseyev’s ecological “adminstrativity”]. Neprikosnovenniy zapas. Vol.123.1: 144-160.
Kovda, Viktor (1952). Velikiy plan preobrazovaniya prirody [The Great Plan for the Transformation of Nature]. Мoscow: Izdaelstvo akademii Nauk SSSR.
Mannheim, Karl (1954) Diagnosis of Our Time: Wartime Essays of a Sociologist. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Minakov, Arkadiy (2011). Russkoy konservatizm v pervoy chetverti XIX veka [Russian Conservatism in the First Quarter of the XIX Century]. Voronezh: Izd-vo. Voronezhskogo gos. un-ta.
Moiseyev, Nikita (1984). Lyudi i kibernetika [People and Cybernetics]. Мoscow: Molodaya gvardiya.
Moiseyev, Nikita (2000). Sudba tsivilizatsii. Put razuma. [The Fate of Civilization. The Path of Reason.] Мoscow: Yazyki russkoy kultury.
Moiseyevskiye chteniya (2018). Moiseyevskiye chteniya. Kultura i gumanitarniye problemy sovremennoy tsivilizatsii. Vserossiyskaza nauchnaya konferentsiya. Doklady i materialy. [Moiseyev readings. Culture and Problems in the Humanities Pertinent to the Contemporary Civilization. All-Russian Scholarly Conference. Papers and Proceedings]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta.
Moiseyevskiye chteniya (2019). Moiseyevskiye chteniya. Kultura kak faktor natsionalnoy bezopasnosti Rossii. Obshсherossiyskaza (natsionalnaya) nauchnaya konferentsiya. Doklady i materialy. [Moiseyev readings. Culture as a Factor of Russia’s National Security. National Scholarly Conference. Papers and Proceedings]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta.
Moiseyevskiye chteniya (2020). Moiseyevskiye chteniya. Kultura i gumanitarniye prob- lemy sovremennoy tsivilizatsii. Obshсherossiyskaza (natsionalnaya) nauchnaya konferentsiya. Doklady i materialy. [Moiseyev readings. Culture and Problems in the Humanities Pertinent to the Contemporary Civilization. National Scholarly Conference. Papers and Proceedings]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo Moskovskogo gumanitarnogo universiteta.
Muller, Jerry Z., ed. (1997). Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Oakeshott, Michael (1962). Rationalism in Politics and Other Essays, London: Methuen and co ltd.
Peters, Benjamin (2016). How Not to Network a Nation: The Uneasy History of the Soviet Internet. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
Repnikov, Alexander (2007). Konservativniye kontseptsii pereustroystva Rossii [Conservative Conceptions of Russia’s Reconstruction]. Мoscow: Academia.
Rindzeviciute, Egle (2015). The Future as an Intellectual Technology in the Soviet Union. From Centralised Planning to Reflexive Management // Cahiers du Monde russe. Vol. 56.1: 111-134.
Rindzeviciute, Egle (2016). The Power of Systems: How Policy Sciences Opened Up The Cold War World. Ithaca; L.: Cornell University Press.
Rindzeviciute, Egle (2020). “Soviet Policy Sciences and Earth System Governmental- ity”. Modern Intellectual History. Vol. 17.1.: 179-208.
Shchedrovitskiy, Georgiy (2003). Metodologiya i filosofiya organizatsionno-upravlencheskoy deyatelnosti: osnovniye ponyatiya i printsipy (kurs lektsiy) [Methodology and Philosophy of Organizational-administrative Action: Fundamental Concepts and Principles (lecture course)]. Vol. 5. Moscow: ORU.
Thompson, Willie (2011). Ideologies in the Age of Extremes: Liberalism, Conservatism, Communism, Fascism 1914-91. NY: Pluto Press.
Walicki, Andrzej (1964). W kręgu konserwatywnej utopii. Struktura i przemiany rosyjskiego słowianofilstwa, Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.
Опубликован
2021-01-20
Как цитировать
Кобылин, И. (2021). «Выжидать и лавировать», или Кибернетическая правительность в консервативном стиле. Stasis, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.33280/2310-3817-21-10-2-77-101
Раздел
Статьи
Copyright (c) 2020 Европейский университет в Санкт-Петербурге
Это произведение доступно по лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
