Мировая история как революция: Борис Поршнев и опыт диалектического поражения
Ключевые слова:
Поршнев, русская революция, мировая история, философия истории, исторический материализм
Аннотация
Данная статья дает представление о «Критике человеческой истории», неизвестном прежде труде советского марксистского мыслителя Бориса Поршнева — важнейшем вкладе в интеллектуальный жанр всемирной истории, сделанный в советскую эпоху. Поршневский синтез негативной диалектики и исторического материализма включил негативность поражения революции в сталинистской России в радикальную телеологическую перспективу, в которой всемирная история рассматривалась как отдельная когнитивная и политическая революция. В статье дается представление о многочисленных институциональных, культурных и идеологических контекстах, связанных с поршневским переживанием поражения революции в советское время. Делается акцент на необходимости исторического подхода к апроприации интеллектуального наследия революции и подчеркивается актуальность поршневской мысли для современных философских, антропологических и исторических дискуссий.
Литература
Anderson, Perry (1976). Considerations on Western Marxism. London: Verso.
ARAN — Arkhiv Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk [Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences].
Bergenthum, Hartmut (2004). Weltgeschichten im Zeitalter der Weltpolitik: Zur populaeren Geschichtsschreibung im wilhelminischen Deutschland. Munich: M-Press.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
David-Fox, Michael (2015). Crossing Borders. Modernity, Ideology, and Culture in Russia and the Soviet Union. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Debray, Régis (2007) “Socialism: A Life Cycle,” New Left Review, 46, (July-August): 5–28.
Feldner, Heiko (2003). “The New Scientificity in Historical Writing around 1800.” In Writing History: Theory and Practice, eds. Heiko Feldner, Kevin Passmore, and Stefan Berger, 3–22. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Halfin, Igal (2000). From Darkness to Light: Class, Consciousness, and Salvation in Revolutionary Russia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Harbsmeier, Michael (1989). “World Histories Before Domestication: Writing Universal Histories, Histories of Mankind and World Histories in 18th Century Germany.” Culture and History 5: 93–131.
Hill, Christopher, Rodney Hilton, and Eric Hobsbawm (1983). “Past and Present: Origins and Early Years.” Past and Present 100: 3–14.
Joravsky, David (1961). Soviet Marxism and Natural Science, 1917–1932. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kassof, Brian (2005). “A Book of Socialism: Stalinist Culture and the First Edition of the Bolshaia sovetskaia entsiklopediia.” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 6.1: 55–95.
Kennedy, Michael (2015). Globalizing Knowledge. Intellectuals, Universities, and Publics in Transformation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Keucheyan, Razmig (2013). Left Hemisphere: Mapping Critical Theory Today. Trans. Gre-
gory Elliott. London: Verso.
Kondratieva, Tamara (2012). “B. F. Porshnev chitaet Bakunina” [B. F. Porshnev reads Bakunin]. Vestnik Tiumenskogo Universiteta. Seriia Istoria [Tyumen University bulletin. History series] 2: 210–14.
Lukin, Nikolai (1937). “Osnovnye problemy postroeniia vsemirnoi istorii,” [The major problems of constructing world history] Istorik-marksist [Historian-Marxist] 3: 3–23.
Magun, Artemy (2017). “Boris Porshnev’s Dialectic of History.” Stasis 5.2: 218–46.
NIOR RGB — Nauchno-issledovatel’skii Otdel Rukopisei Rossiiskoii GosudarstvennoiBiblioteki [The Manuscript Division of the Russian State Library].
Porshnev, Boris (1926). Gorsovety i rabotnitsa [City councils and female workers]. Moscow: Leningrad.
Porchnev, Boris (1963). Les soulèvements populaires en France de 1623 à 1648. Paris: S.E.V.P.E.N.
Porshnev, Boris (1964). Feodalizm i narodnye massy [Feudalism and popular masses]. Moscow: Nauka.
Porshnev, Boris (1968). “Bor’ba za trogloditov” [A struggle for troglodytes]. Prostor 4: 98–112.
Porshnev, Boris (1969). “Myslima li istoriia odnoi strany?” [Is a history of a single country possible?]. In Istoricheskaiia nauka i nekotorye problemy sovremennosti [Historical science and some problems of modernity], 301–17. Moscow: Nauka.
Porshnev, Boris (1970). Frantsia, Angliiskaia revoliutsiia i Evropeiskaia politika v seredine XVII veka [France, the English Revolution, and European politics in the mid-se-venteenth century] Moscow: Nauka.
Porshnev, Boris (1974). O nachale chelovecheskoy istorii [On the origin of human history] Moscow: Mysl.
Porshnev, Boris (1995). Muscovy and Sweden in the Thirty Years’ War, 1630–1635. Ed.
Paul Dukes, trans. Brian Pearce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Porshnev, Boris (2007). O nachale chelovecheskoy istorii [On the origin of human history]. Moscow: Aletheia.
Ryzhkovskyi, Vladimir (2009). “Sovetskaia medievistika and beyond (k istorii odnoii diskussii)” [Soviet medieval studies and beyond (A history of a discussion)]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review] 97: 58–89.
Ryzhkovskyi, Vladimir (2017). “Byl li u russkoi revoliutsii svoi Gegel?” [Did the Russian
Revolution have its Hegel?]. Gefter. http://gefter.ru/archive/22681
Sziklai, László (1992) After the Proletarian Revolution. Georg Lukács’s Marxist Development, 1930–1945. Trans. Ivan Sellei. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
Woolf, Daniel (2011). A Global History of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhukov, Evgeny (1955–1965). Vsemirnaia Istoriia v 10 tomakh [World History in 10 volumes]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe Izdatelstvo Politicheskoi Literatury.
ARAN — Arkhiv Rossiiskoi Akademii Nauk [Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences].
Bergenthum, Hartmut (2004). Weltgeschichten im Zeitalter der Weltpolitik: Zur populaeren Geschichtsschreibung im wilhelminischen Deutschland. Munich: M-Press.
Chakrabarty, Dipesh (2000). Provincializing Europe: Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
David-Fox, Michael (2015). Crossing Borders. Modernity, Ideology, and Culture in Russia and the Soviet Union. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Debray, Régis (2007) “Socialism: A Life Cycle,” New Left Review, 46, (July-August): 5–28.
Feldner, Heiko (2003). “The New Scientificity in Historical Writing around 1800.” In Writing History: Theory and Practice, eds. Heiko Feldner, Kevin Passmore, and Stefan Berger, 3–22. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Halfin, Igal (2000). From Darkness to Light: Class, Consciousness, and Salvation in Revolutionary Russia. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Harbsmeier, Michael (1989). “World Histories Before Domestication: Writing Universal Histories, Histories of Mankind and World Histories in 18th Century Germany.” Culture and History 5: 93–131.
Hill, Christopher, Rodney Hilton, and Eric Hobsbawm (1983). “Past and Present: Origins and Early Years.” Past and Present 100: 3–14.
Joravsky, David (1961). Soviet Marxism and Natural Science, 1917–1932. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kassof, Brian (2005). “A Book of Socialism: Stalinist Culture and the First Edition of the Bolshaia sovetskaia entsiklopediia.” Kritika: Explorations in Russian and Eurasian History, 6.1: 55–95.
Kennedy, Michael (2015). Globalizing Knowledge. Intellectuals, Universities, and Publics in Transformation. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Keucheyan, Razmig (2013). Left Hemisphere: Mapping Critical Theory Today. Trans. Gre-
gory Elliott. London: Verso.
Kondratieva, Tamara (2012). “B. F. Porshnev chitaet Bakunina” [B. F. Porshnev reads Bakunin]. Vestnik Tiumenskogo Universiteta. Seriia Istoria [Tyumen University bulletin. History series] 2: 210–14.
Lukin, Nikolai (1937). “Osnovnye problemy postroeniia vsemirnoi istorii,” [The major problems of constructing world history] Istorik-marksist [Historian-Marxist] 3: 3–23.
Magun, Artemy (2017). “Boris Porshnev’s Dialectic of History.” Stasis 5.2: 218–46.
NIOR RGB — Nauchno-issledovatel’skii Otdel Rukopisei Rossiiskoii GosudarstvennoiBiblioteki [The Manuscript Division of the Russian State Library].
Porshnev, Boris (1926). Gorsovety i rabotnitsa [City councils and female workers]. Moscow: Leningrad.
Porchnev, Boris (1963). Les soulèvements populaires en France de 1623 à 1648. Paris: S.E.V.P.E.N.
Porshnev, Boris (1964). Feodalizm i narodnye massy [Feudalism and popular masses]. Moscow: Nauka.
Porshnev, Boris (1968). “Bor’ba za trogloditov” [A struggle for troglodytes]. Prostor 4: 98–112.
Porshnev, Boris (1969). “Myslima li istoriia odnoi strany?” [Is a history of a single country possible?]. In Istoricheskaiia nauka i nekotorye problemy sovremennosti [Historical science and some problems of modernity], 301–17. Moscow: Nauka.
Porshnev, Boris (1970). Frantsia, Angliiskaia revoliutsiia i Evropeiskaia politika v seredine XVII veka [France, the English Revolution, and European politics in the mid-se-venteenth century] Moscow: Nauka.
Porshnev, Boris (1974). O nachale chelovecheskoy istorii [On the origin of human history] Moscow: Mysl.
Porshnev, Boris (1995). Muscovy and Sweden in the Thirty Years’ War, 1630–1635. Ed.
Paul Dukes, trans. Brian Pearce. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Porshnev, Boris (2007). O nachale chelovecheskoy istorii [On the origin of human history]. Moscow: Aletheia.
Ryzhkovskyi, Vladimir (2009). “Sovetskaia medievistika and beyond (k istorii odnoii diskussii)” [Soviet medieval studies and beyond (A history of a discussion)]. Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie [New Literary Review] 97: 58–89.
Ryzhkovskyi, Vladimir (2017). “Byl li u russkoi revoliutsii svoi Gegel?” [Did the Russian
Revolution have its Hegel?]. Gefter. http://gefter.ru/archive/22681
Sziklai, László (1992) After the Proletarian Revolution. Georg Lukács’s Marxist Development, 1930–1945. Trans. Ivan Sellei. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
Woolf, Daniel (2011). A Global History of History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhukov, Evgeny (1955–1965). Vsemirnaia Istoriia v 10 tomakh [World History in 10 volumes]. Moscow: Gosudarstvennoe Izdatelstvo Politicheskoi Literatury.
Опубликован
2018-12-28
Как цитировать
Ryzhkovskyi, V. (2018). Мировая история как революция: Борис Поршнев и опыт диалектического поражения. Stasis, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.33280/2310-3817-2018-6-2-176-197
Раздел
Тематические статьи
