Protest and Democracy: Hannah Arendt and the Foundation of Freedom
Abstract
The great political achievement of the modern era, stable representative democracies that legitimate power, are everywhere under attack. No thinker can better help understand our present democratic disillusionment than Hannah Arendt. Arendt argues that as bureaucracies and governments grow, individual action is evermore attenuated in its ability to make a difference in the world. The result is frustration that can lead to indignation and anger of citizens on both the left and the right. And a consequence of this increasing anger and frustration is the glorification of protest as a space of freedom in modern politics. In this paper I explore the works of a number of political theorists who have been writing in the last twenty to thirty years and who are all arguing that the place to look for freedom is not in government, but in protest. And I’m going to contrast them with Arendt’s argument that freedom must be instituted and founded in political institutions. The three theorists of protest I have in mind are Simon Critchley, David Graeber, and Jacques Rancière.
References
Arendt, Hannah (1972b). “On Violence.” In Crises of the Republic, 103–98. New York: Mariner Books.
Arendt, Hannah (2006a). “What is Freedom?” In Between Past Future, 142–69. New York: Penguin Books.
Arendt, Hannah (2006b). On Revolution. New York: Penguin Books.
Arendt, Hannah (n.d.). “Correspondence File, General, 1938–1976.” In Reisman, David, 1947–56. 009240. Hannah Arendt Papers 1898–1977. Manuscript Division, Library of Congress, Washington DC.
Critchley, Simon (2012). Infinitely Demanding. London: Verso.
Graeber, David (2002). “The New Anarchists.” The New Left Review13: 61–73.
Graeber, David (2009). Direct Action: An Ethnography. Oakland, CA: AK Press.
Graeber, David (2011). “Awaiting the Magical Spark.” Adbusters, July 2011. https://www.adbusters.org/article/david-graeber-2/
Graeber, David (2013). The Democracy Project: A History, a Crisis, a Movement. New York: Spiegel & Grau.
Gündogdu, Ayten (2015). Rightlessness in an Age of Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Madison, James (2001). “Federalist 10.” In The Federalist, ed. Robert Scigliano. New York: Modern Library.
Maeckelbergh, Marianne (2011). “Doing is Believing: Prefiguration as Strategy and Practice in the Alterglobalization Movement.” Social Movement Studies 10: 1–20.
Markell, Patchell (2006). “The Rule of the People: Arendt, Arché, and Democracy.” American Political Science Review 100: 1–14.
Moyn, Samuel (2012). The Last Utopia. New York: Belknap Press.
Rancière, Jacques (2010a). “Does Democracy Mean Something?” In Dissensus, 45–61. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Rancière, Jacques (2010b). “Who Is the Subject of the Rights of Man?” In Dissensus, 62–75. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
de Tocqueville, Alexis(2000). Democracy in America. Trans. Harvey C. Mansfield and Delba Winthrop. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Van de Sande, Mathijs (2015). “Fighting with Tools: Prefiguration and Radical Politics in the Twenty-First Century.” Rethinking Marxism 27.2: 177–94.
Yates, Lukes (2015). “Rethinking Prefiguration: Alternatives, Micropolitics and Goals in Social Movements.” Social Movement Studies 14: 1–21.
Copyright (c) 2018 Stasis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
