The Fundamental Concepts of Vladimir Bibikhin’s Metaphysics (sophia - strangeness - interest)
Abstract
This article attempts to articulate and develop key concepts of Vladimir Bibikhin’s metaphysics, as presented in a series of important lecture courses. These concepts form the triad “sophia—strangeness—interest,” in some ways serving as a “translation” of M. Heidegger’s “world—finitude—solitude” (from the subtitle of his Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics) into the hermeneutic language of the Russian 1990s. As is well known, Bibikhin translated the first chapters of this book, as well as a range of other important works by Heidegger. Despite their significant influence upon him, Bibikhin’s own metaphysical thought is truly original, since his goal is not the construction of a distinctive system but the reproduction here and now, in concrete historical circumstances, of an original philosophical gesture of seeing – indicating, in particular, his interest in the themes of energy, property, the woods, as well as his constant attention to the idiosyncrasy of Russian reality (beyond “westernizing” criticism and “slavophile” praise). In the concluding section of the article, I show how important the works of N. V. Gogol are for understanding Bibikhin’s thought, as he periodically refers to this author’s texts, either explicitly or implicitly.
References
Agamben, Giorgio (1999). Potentialities: Collected Essays in Philosophy. Stanford: Stan ford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio (2004). The Open: Man and Animal. Trans. Kevin Attel. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio (2009). What is an Apparatus? and Other Essays. Trans. David Kishik and Stefan Pedatella. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Agamben, Giorgio (2011). “What is a Commandment?” http://bat020.wordpress.com/ 2011/03/30/giorgio-agamben-what-is-a-commandment/. Accessed 02.07.2014.
Akhutin, Anatolii (2005). Povorotnye vremena [Changing times]. St. Petersburg: Nauka.
Barthes, Roland (1976). Sade, Fourier, Loyola. Trans. Richard Hiller. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Belyi, Andrei (1934). Masterstvo Gogolia [Gogol’s mastership]. Moscow: OGIZ.
Berger, Peter and Thomas Luckmann (1966). The Social Construction of Reality: A Trea- tise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Penguin.
Bibikhin, Vladimir (1998). Uznai sebia [Know thyself]. St. Petersburg: Nauka.
Bibikhin, Vladimir (2000). “Logiko-filosofskii traktat Vitgenshteina” [Logic and philo sophical tractate by Wittgenstein] In Filosofiia na troikh: A.V. Akhutin, V.V. Bibikh- in, A. Piatigorskii. Riga: RaKa.
Bibikhin, Vladimir (2005a). Vvedenie v filosofiiu prava [Introduction to the philosophy of law]. Moscow: IF RAN.
Bibikhin, Vladimir (2005b). Vitgenshtein: smena aspekta [Wittgenstein: Shift of Aspect]. Moscow: Institut filosofii, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy.
Bibikhin, Vladimir (2009). Rannii Khaidegger: Materialy k seminaru [Early Heidegger. Materials for a Seminar]. Moscow: Institut filosofii, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy.
Bibikhin, Vladimir (2010). Energiia [Energy]. Moscow: Institut filosofii, teologii i istorii sv. Fomy.
Bibikhin, Vladimir (2011). Les. [Wood(s)]. St. Petersburg: Nauka.
Bibikhin, Vladimir (2012). Sobstvennost’: Filosofiia svoego [Property: The Philosophy of One’s Own]. St. Petersburg: Nauka.
Bulgakov, Sergei (1993). “Filosofiia khoziastva” 11. [The philosophy of household]. In Sochineniia v dvukh tomakh. Vol 1. Moscow: Nauka.
Deleuze, Gilles (1998). Essays Critical and Clinical. Trans. Daniel W. Smith and Michael A. Greco. New York: Verso.
Derrida, Jacques (1987) “Geschlecht II: Heidegger’s Hand.” Trans. John P. Leavy, Jr. In Deconstruction and Philosophy: The Texts of Jacques Derrida. Ed. John Sallis. Chi cago: University of Chicago Press.
Filippov, Aleksandr (2008). “K politiko-pravovoi filosofii prostranstva Karla Shmitta” [To political and juridical philosophy of space by Karl Schmitt]. In Schmitt, Karl. Nomos zemli v prave narodov jus publicum europaeum [Nomos of land in peoples’ law jus piblicum europaeum]. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’.
Freid, Zigmund (2014). Psikhoanaliz, religiia, kul’tura [Psychoanalysis, religion, culture]. Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI Reabilitatsiia.
Gogol, Nikolai (1952). Sobranie sochinenii v shesti tomakh [Collection of works in 6 volu mes]. Vol. 3. Povesti. Moscow: GIKhL.
Gogol, Nikolai (1953). Sobranie sochinenii v shesti tomakh . [Collection of works in 6 vo lumes]. Vol. 5. Mertvyi dushi. Moscow: GIKhL.
Heidegger, Martin (1976). What Is Called Thinking? New York: Perennial.
Heidegger, Martin (1995). The Fundamental Concepts of Metaphysics: World, Finitude, Solitude. Trans. William McNeill and Nicholas Walker. Bloomington: Indiana Uni versity Press.
Hirschman, Albert (2013). The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before its Triumph. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Khaidegger, Martin (2013). Osnovnye poniatiia metafiziki [The main notions of metaphysics]. St. Petersburg: Vladimir Dal’.
Kierkegaard, Siren (2009). Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Crumbs. Trans. Alastair Hannay. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marx, Karl and Friedrich Engels (1998). The German Ideology. New York: Prometheus.
Mauss, Marcel (1966). The Gift: Forms and Functions of Exchange in Archaic Societies. Trans. Ian Cunnison. London: Cohen and West.
Schmitt, Carl (2006). The Nomos of the Earth in the International Law of the Jus Publicum Europaeum. Trans. G. L. Ulmen. New York: Telos.
Siniavskii, Andrei (Abram Terts) (2009). V teni Gogolia [In Gogol’s shadow]. Moscow: KoLibri.
Surya, Michel (2002). “Figures du rebut humain.” In Vainquers/Vaincus. Ed. Michel Surya. Paris: Revue Lignes.
Vaiskopf, Mikhail (2002). Siuzhet Gogolia: Morfologiia, ideologiia, kontekst [Gogol’s plot. Morphology, ideology, context]. 2nd ed. Moscow: RGGU.
Vico, Giambatista (1948). The New Science. Trans. Thomas Goddard Bergin and Max Harold Fisch. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Xenophon (1876). The Economist. Trans. Alexander Wedderburn and W. Gershom Collingwood. London: Ellis and White.
Zizek, Slavoj (2008). “Why Lacan is not a Heideggerian.” In The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso, p. vvi–xxi.
Copyright (c) 2015 Stasis
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.