Consciousness and Affectivity: Spinoza and Vygotsky

  • Pascal Sévérac
Keywords: Spinoza, Vygotsky, сonsciousness, experience [perezhivanie], Affect

Abstract

This article seeks to compare Spinoza’s philosophy with Vygotsky’s psychology on the problem of consciousness: How should one define this entity of internal reflexivity, if one’s analytical point of departure is not personal and substantial thought, but social and interpersonal relation, constitutive of individual thought? One of the clearest definitions of consciousness Vygotsky gives is the following: “consciousness is the experience of experiences (soznanie est’ perezhivanie perezhivanii).” This conception of consciousness is very close to that of Spinoza who, defining it as “the idea of the idea,” explains the extent to which consciousness and affectivity are linked. We will therefore show in what sense consciousness, understood as Affect, is constituted by the social environment, and why we can identify degrees of consciousness or awareness in children, depending on whether the lived affect is more or less developed, that is, more or less active. And we will relate the power of reflexivity of consciousness to the power of reversibility of corporeal affections, starting with that of words.

Author Biography

Pascal Sévérac

PhD in Philosophy, Lecturer
Paris-Est Créteil Univeristy
61 Avenue du Général de Gaulle, Créteil, France 94000
e-mai: pseverac@yahoo.fr 

References

Balibar, Etienne (2013). Identity and Difference: John Locke and the Invention of Consciousness. Ed. Stella Sandford, trans. Warren Montag. London: Verso.

Bernstein, Nikolai (2009). “On Dexterity and its Development.” In Dexterity and its Development, eds. Mark L. Latash and Michael T. Turvey, trans. Mark L. Latash, 3–246. New York: Psychology Press.

Bronckart, Jean-Paul and Friedrich Janette (2010). “Présentation.” In La signification historique de la crise en psychologie, Lev Vygotsky, 15–59. Paris: La Dispute.

Clot, Yves (2003). “Vygotski, la conscience comme liaison.” In Conscience, inconscient, émotions, Lev Vygotsky, 7–59. Paris: La Dispute.

Clot, Yves (2008). Travail et pouvoir d’agir. Paris: PUF.

Cristofolini, Paolo (2012). “Une nouvelle édition critique de l’Éthique.” In Spinoza trans- alpin, eds. Chantal Jaquet and Pierre-François Moreau, 11–22. Paris: Publications de la Sorbonne.

Descartes, Rene (1983). Œuvres de Descartes. Vol. VII, Meditationes de prima philosophia. Paris: Librairie philosophique J. Vrin.

Gueroult, Martial (1974). Spinoza. L’âme (Éthique, 2). Paris: Aubier-Montaigne.

Macherey, Pierre (1995). Introduction à l’Éthique de Spinoza. La troisième partie: la vie affective. Paris: PUF.

Sévérac, Pascal (2005). Le devenir actif chez Spinoza. Paris: Honoré Champion.

Spinoza, Benedict (1955). On the Improvement of Understanding, trans. R. H. M. Elwes. New York: Dover.

Spinoza, Benedict (1966). The Correspondence of Spinoza, ed. Abraham Wolf. London: Frank Cass.

Spinoza, Benedict (1985). The Collected Works of Spinoza, ed. Edwin Curley. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Spinoza, Baruch (1988). Éthique. Trans. Bernard Pautrat. Paris: Éditions du Seuil. Spinoza, Benedict (1996). Ethics, ed. Edwin Curley. London: Penguin.

Toassa, Gisele (2014). “Creating a Materialistic Psychology—Sources and Influence of Spinoza in Vygotsky’s Works.” In International Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Science 2.5: 83–94. http://www.ijlass.org/data/frontImages/gallery/Vol._2_ No._5/9.pdf

Veresov, Nikolai (2014). “Émotions, perezhivanie et développement culturel: le projet inachevé de Lev Vygotski.” In Sémiotique, culture et développement psychologique, eds. Christiane Moro and Nathalie Muller Mirza, trans. Yves Bonin, 209–35. Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses Universitaires du Septentrion.

Vygotsky, Lev (1982a). “Soznanie kak problema psichologii povedeniia” [Consciousness as a problem for the psychology of behaviour] [1925]. In Sobranie sochinenii, T. 3 [Collected works, Vol. III], 78–98. Moscow: Pedagogika.

Vygotsky, Lev (1982b). “Metodika refleksologicheskogo i psichologicheskogo issledovaniia” [The methods of reflexological and psychological investigation] [1924]. In Sobranie sochinenii, T. 1 [Collected works, Vol. I], 43–62. Moscow: Pedagogika.

Vygotsky, Lev (1987). “Thought and Word.” In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. I, eds. Robert W. Rieber and Jeffrey Wollock, trans. Norris Minick, 243–86. New York: Plenum Press.
Vygostky, Lev (1995). “The Problem of the Environment.” In The Vygotsky Reader, eds.

René Van der Veer & Jaan Valsiner, 338–54. Oxford: Blackwell.

Vygotsky, Lev (1997a). “The Methods of Reflexological and Psychological Investiga­ tion.” In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. III, eds. Robert W. Rieber and Jeffrey Wollock, 35–49. New York: Plenum Press.

Vygostky, Lev (1997b). “Consciousness as a Problem for the Psychology of Behavior.” In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. III, eds. Robert W. Rieber and Jeffrey Wollock, trans. René Van der Veer, 63–79. New York: Plenum Press.

Vygotsky, Lev (1997c). “Mind, Consciousness, the Unconscious.” In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. III, eds. Robert W. Rieber and Jeffrey Wollock, trans. René Van der Veer, 109–22. New York: Plenum Press.

Vygotsky, Lev (1999) “The Teaching about Emotions: Historical-Psychological Studies.” In The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky, Vol. VI, ed. Robert W. Rieber, trans. Marie J. Hall, 71–235. New York: Plenum Press.

Zavershneva, Ekaterina (2014). “The Problem of Consciousness in Vygotsky’s Cultural-Historical Psychology.” In The Cambridge Handbook of Cultural-Historical Psychology, eds. Anton Yasnitsky, René van der Veer, and Michel Ferrari, 63–100. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Published
2017-12-18
How to Cite
Sévérac, P. (2017). Consciousness and Affectivity: Spinoza and Vygotsky. Stasis, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.33280/2310-3817-2017-5-2-80-109