Syndicalist Marxism for Reactionary Times: Sorel’s Revolutionary Politics of Production

  • Marina Simakova
Keywords: Class, machine, myth, production, progress, reaction, syndicalism, Sorel


This article explores Georges Sorel’s political and social thought during the period in which his passage to revolutionary syndicalism took place. In contrast to the established view on Sorel as a reactionary thinker, it presents him as a Marxist critic of reactionary tendencies in the politics of his time. Drawing on three of his works written during 1905–1909, it provides a synthesis of his political critique and presents his analysis of progressivism as a major illusion of modernity. In respect to Sorel’s social theory, the article reconstructs his conceptualization of production and proletarian subjectivity. It argues that the new forms of sociality emergent within the forces of production represent revolutionary attitudes of producing classes, which also find their expression in syndicalist politics.

Author Biography

Marina Simakova

Independent Researcher
30 Kirochnaya St., St Petersburg, Russia 191123


Brandom, Eric (2016). “Georges Sorel’s Diremption: Hegel, Marxism and Anti-Dia- lectics.” History of European Ideas 42.7: 937–50.

Cole, George D. H. (1963). A History of Socialist Thought. The Second International 1889–1914. Vol. 3, Part 1. London: Macmillan.

Giordani, Tommaso (2018). “On Sorel and Bergson. The Impact of Bergsonian Ideas on Sorel’s Reflections on Violence.” Lo Sguardo 26.1: 163–81.

Hirschman, Albert (1991). The Rhetoric of Reaction: Perversity, Futility, Jeopardy. Cam- bridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Halévy, Élie (1938). “Letter from Marcel Mauss to Élie Halévy (1936)”. In L’ère des tyrannies, 230–31. Paris: Gallimard.

Kolakowski, Leszek (1978). Main Currents of Marxism: Its Rise, Growth, and Dissolution. Vol. II. Trans. Paul S. Falla. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Laskowski, Piotr (2014). “Georges Sorel, l’intempestif. Au prisme des stratégies contemporaines.” Trans. Anna Blumsztajn. Mil neuf cent. Revue d’histoire intel- lectuelle 32.1: 147–80.

Marx, Karl (1990). Capital. Vol. 1. Trans. Ben Fowkes. London: Penguin Classics. Müller, Jan-Werner (2011). Contesting Democracy: Political Ideas in Twentieth-Century Europe. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Pascal, Blaise (1994). The Provincial Letters, Pensées, Scientific Treatises. Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.

Robin, Corey. 2018. The Reactionary Mind. Conservatism from Edmund Burke to Donald Trump. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Sand, Shlomo (1983). “Quelques remarques sur Sorel critique de L’évolution créatrice.

Quatre lettres inédites de Bergson à Sorel.” In Cahiers Georges Sorel 1 : 109–23. Sand, Shlomo (1985). L’Illusion du politique: Georges Sorel et le débat intellectuel 1900. Paris: La Découverte.

Sorel, Georges (1969). The Illusions of Progress. Trans. John and Charlotte Stanley. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Sorel, Georges (2004). Reflections on Violence. Trans. Thomas E. Hulme, ed. Jeremy Jennings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sorel, Georges (2009). “Decomposition of Marxism.” In Radicalism and the Revolt against Reason, trans. and ed. Irving Louis Horowitz, 207–54. London: Routledge. Stanley, John (1981). The Sociology of Virtue: The Political & Social Theories of George Sorel. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Starobinski, Jean (2003). Action and Reaction: The Life and Adventures of a Couple. New York: Zone Books.

How to Cite
SimakovaM. (2020). Syndicalist Marxism for Reactionary Times: Sorel’s Revolutionary Politics of Production. Stasis, 8(2).
Thematic Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)