Stasis announces a new call for papers for a thematic issue to be published in the summer of 2022: “Act, Labor, Creation”. 

We invite you to submit your papers. The deadline for submissions is 15.01.2022.

Our time manifests and demands hectic activity. We cobble pieces together, drive around, push buttons, carry weights, chatter, smile, sell —  even our thinking is part and parcel of our work. Ever since Aristotle, Western thought proceeds on the assumption that activity is prevalent over all other modes of being. Today, this imperative appears to serve as a justification for the capitalist system, wherein it is money that truly works: hence the multiple theoretical approaches advocating  an end to work, or procrastination. However, being busy is arguably not the same as being truly active: committing acts, such as heroic exploits. Our everyday fuss is, arguably, merely a passive activity. Hannah Arendt, whose terms roughly correspond to the title of this conference, attempted to distinguish the higher meaning of action, or act, as a free, existential achievement, from the more mundane phenomena of work or invention. However, history has proved her wrong, with its continuous intermingling of the three elements — existential action becoming subsumed into instrumental activities such as communication or entrepreneurship.

Is there such a thing, these days, as meaningful work, and which forms does it take? Is the new (cognitive, communicative, emotional) labor the same as work in general, or does it require a new ethic? What kind of subjectivity does it presuppose? Can we distinguish between productive and non-productive labor under contemporary capitalism? Can work be saved, or should we, as far as we can, abandon work and leave it to robots? Should we choose the vita activa, a new vita contemplativa, or claim that intense rest is the highest activity? Can we re-create a theory of activity (as opposed to heroic action), beyond the ideological normativity with which it has been associated, in both Soviet theory (Vygotsky, Leontiev, Ilyenkov et al.), and American pragmatism (Dewey, Searle, Rorty et al.)? Is there a way to restore the hieratic seriousness of acta without falling into new forms of obscurantism? These and other questions are  to address in your articles.

We are announcing an open call for articles on these topics. Email your submissions to: stasis@eu.spb.ru

 

Stasis

An International Journal in Social and Political Philosophy and Theory

Print ISSN 2310-3817 Online ISSN 2500-0721 

Published since 2013 by European University at St Petersburg

Frequency: semiannual (December-January and June-July)

Languages: English, Russian 

Editor: Artemy Magun

Stasis publishes articles on social and political philosophy and theory. It seeks to provide an international intellectual format that can open a common space between the English- and Russian-language philosophical traditions. The journal welcomes interdisciplinarity and covers a broad range of topics, from the purely philosophical, such as negativity, to the culturally and historically specific, such as social movements, religion, and sexuality. 

License terms: authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution License International CC-BY that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in the journal. 

Open-access Statement: the journal provides immediate full-text open access to its content. All articles published in Stasis are available to readers completely free of charge (see Archive).

The journal's Editorial Board ensures high ethical and professional standards based on Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.