Losev’s Eidetic Dialectic: The Structuring of Being and Anagogical Cognition


  • Vitaly Kosykhin
Keywords: anagogy, eidetic dialectic, nihilism, ontology, Platonism

Abstract

Alexei Losev dared to make the radical gesture of integrating Platonist hermeneutics into modern thinking by turning to the genuine tradition of ancient Platonism, especially to the works of Iamblichus and Proclus. The article compares the dialectical approaches of Hegel and Losev, and analyzes the problem of negativity in dialectical discourse. The eidetic dialectic of part and whole, based on the contemplative and anagogical mode of cognition, is considered as a real alternative to negative reductionism and nihilism in contemporary philosophy.

Author Biography

Vitaly Kosykhin

Doctor of Sciences in Philosophy, Professor 
Saratov State University, Department of Philosophy and Methodology of Science
Astrakhanskaya ul. 83, Saratov, Russia 410012
e-mail: KosyhinVG@rambler.ru 

 

References

Eco, Umberto (2002) Art and Beauty in the Middle Ages. Trans. Hugh Bredin. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Hadot, Pierre (2002). Exercices spirituels et philosophie antique. Paris: Albin Michel.

Hegel, G.W.F. (1995). Lectures on the History of Philosophy, Vol. 2: Plato and the Platonists Trans. E.S. Haldane and Frances H. Simson. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. Hegel, G.W.F. (2010a). Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences in Basic Outline, Part 1: Science of Logic [1817]. Trans. Klaus Brinkmann and Daniel O. Dahlstrom. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Hegel, G.W.F. (2010b). The Science of Logic [1812–1816]. Trans. George Di Giovanni. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Heidegger, Martin (1998). “Plato’s Doctrine of Truth” [1931/32]. In Martin Heidegger, Pathmarks, trans. William McNeil. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hyppolite, Jean (1997). Logic and Existence [1952]. Trans. Leonard Lawlor and Amit Sen. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.

Kojève, Alexandre (1980). Introduction to the Reading of Hegel: Lectures on the Phenomenology of Spirit. Trans. James H. Nichols, Jr. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Losev, A.F. (1990). “Filosofiia imeni” [Philosophy of the name]. In A.F. Losev, Iz rannikh proizvedenii [From the early works]. Moscow: Pravda.

Losev, A.F. (1993). Ocherki antichnogo simvolizma i mifologii [Essays on ancient symbolism and mythology]. Moscow: Mysl’.

Losev, Alexei (2003). The Dialectics of Myth. Trans. Vladimir Marchenkov. London: Routledge.

Lukomskii, L.Iu. (2001). “Prokl Diadokh i glavnii trud ego zhizni — ‘Platonovskaia teologiia,’” [Proclus Diadochus and his magnum opus ‘The Platonic Theology’]. In Prokl [Proclus], Platonovskaia teologiia [The Platonic theology]. Saint-Petersburg: Letnii Sad.

Proclus (1986). The Platonic Theology. Trans. Thomas Taylor. New York: Selene Books.

Sartre, Jean-Paul (2001). Being and Nothingness: An Essay in Phenomenological Ontology [1943]. Trans. Hazel E. Barnes. New York: Citadel Press.
Published
2013-01-09
How to Cite
Kosykhin, V. (2013). Losev’s Eidetic Dialectic: The Structuring of Being and Anagogical Cognition. Stasis, 1(1). Retrieved from http://stasisjournal.net/index.php/journal/article/view/64