Toward a More Robust New Materialist Politics: How the Practice of Criminal Animal Trials Can Inform Contemporary Politics

  • Zachary Low Reyna
Keywords: New materialisms, animal trials, Michel Serres, natural law, environmental politics

Abstract

Prior to the twentieth century, animals were routinely put on trial in human courtrooms. This curious practice has received little academic attention. In this article, I examine the phenomenon of animal trials as an “old” New Materialism. Both part and parcel of the Western legal systems that gave rise to modern law and somehow excessive or extravagant to modern law, the practice of putting animals on trial provides insight into how occidental law and politics has traditionally grappled with the question of the nonhuman, and also the potentialities and shortcomings of recent attempts to include the nonhuman in modern law and politics. The goal of this article is not to resuscitate these archaic practices, but to explore a path not taken by modern law, and so open a route for both deepening our appreciation of the historical possibilities of a New Materialist politics and pushing it further.

Author Biography

Zachary Low Reyna

Professor, School of Advanced Studies
University of Tyumen,
8 Marta St. 2k1, Tyumen, Tyumenskaya Oblast, Russian Federation
E-mail: zel.reyna@gmail.com

References

Abrams, David (1997). The Spell of the Sensuous. New York: Vintage.
Alaimo, Stacey, and Susan Hekman (2008). Material Feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Barad, Karen (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bennett, Jane (2001). The Enchantment of Modern Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bennett, Jane (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Bennett, Jane (2012). “Systems and Things: A Response to Graham Harman and Timothy Morton.” New Literary History 43.2: 225–33.
Berman, Paul Schiff (2000). “An Observation and a Strange but True ‘Tale’: What Might the Historical Trials of Animals Tell us about the Transformative Potential of Law in American Culture?” Hastings Law Journal 52.1: 123–78.
Bryant, Levi, Graham Harman, and Nick Srnicek, eds. (2011). The Speculative Turn: Continental Materialism and Realism. Melbourne: Re.press.
Cohen, Esther (1986). “Law, Folklore, and Animal Lore.” Past & Present 110.1: 6–37. Cole, Andrew (2013). “The Call of Things.” The Minnesota Review 80: 106–18.
Coole, Diana, and Samantha Frost (2010). New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Cullinan, Cormac (2011). Wild Law: A Manifesto for Earth Justice Second Edition. Hartford, VT: Chelsea Green Publishing.
Dean, Jodi (2009). Democracy and Other Neoliberal Fantasies: Communicative Capitalism and Left Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Deleuze, Gilles (1986). Cinema 2. Trans. Hugh Tomlinson. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Evans, Edward (2009). The Criminal Prosecution and Capital Punishment of Animals [1906]. Clark, NJ: Lawbook Exchange Ltd.
Ferguson, Kathy (2014). “Anarchist Printers and Presses: Material Circuits of Politics.”Political Theory 42.4: 391–14.
Foucault, Michel (2012). The Order of Things: An Archaeology of Human Sciences [1966]. New York: Vintage.
Girgen, Jen (2003). “The Historical and Contemporary Prosecution and Punishment of Animals.” Animal Law Review 9: 97–133.
Harman, Graham (2005). Guerilla Metaphysics: Phenomenology and the Carpentry of Things. Chicago: Open Court.
Harman, Graham (2009). Prince of Networks: Bruno Latour and Metaphysics. Melbourne: Re.press.
Hart, HLA (2012). The Concept of Law [1961]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Horkheimer, Max (1947). The Eclipse of Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kang, Hyo Yoon (2019). “Legal Materiality.” In The Oxford Handbook of Law and Humanities, ed. Simon Stern. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190695620.001.0001/oxford- hb-9780190695620-e-9
Kelsen, Hans (2014). Pure Theory of Law [1960]. Clark, NJ: Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. Kirton-Darling, Edward (2018). “Searching for Pigeons in the Belfry.” Law, Culture and Humanities 41.3: 439–61.
Klein, Naomi (2015). This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs. the Climate. New York: Simone and Schuster.
Kovel, Joel (2007). The Enemy of Nature: The End of Capitalism or the End of the World? London: Zed Books.
Latour, Bruno (1993). We Have Never Been Modern [1991]. Trans. Catherin Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno (2004). The Politics of Nature. Trans. Catherin Porter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno (2005). Reassembling the Social. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Latour, Bruno (2017). Facing Gaia. Trans. Cather Porter. Cambridge: Polity.
Leeson, Peter (2013). “Vermin Trials.” The Journal of Law and Economics 56.3: 811–36. Lowy, Michael (2015). Ecosocialism: A Radical Alternative to Capitalist Catastrophe. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
Malinowski, Bronisław (2014). Crime and Custom in Savage Society [1926]. Mansfield, CT: Martino Publishing.
Marx, Karl (1991). “Letter from Karl Marx to Arnold Ruge” [1844]. Marxist Internet Archive. https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1843/letters/43_09-alt.htm
McWilliams, James (2013). “Beastly Justice.” Slate, 21 Feb 2013. https://slate.com/human-interest/2013/02/medieval-animal-trials-why-theyre-not-quite-as-crazy-
as-they-sound.html.
Meillassoux, Quentin (2010). After Finitude. London: Bloomsbury.
Morton, Timothy (2017). Humankind: Solidarity with Nonhuman People. London: Verso. Nietzsche, Friedrich (2006). Thus Spoke Zarathustra. Trans. Adrian Del Caro. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pickering, Andrew (1995). The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pietz, William (1997). “The Death of the Deodand.” RES: Anthropology and Aesthetics 31: 97–108.
Reyna, Zachary Low (2018). “Aquinas’s Ecological Vision: Natural Law and Friendship in Contemporary Environmental Political Thought.” New Political Science 40.1: 15–32.
Ridler, Victoria (2013). “Dressing the Sow and the Legal Subjectivation of the Non-human Animal.” Law and the Question of the Animal: A Critical Jurisprudence, ed. Edward Mussawir, 102–15. New York: Routledge.
Roy, Eleanor Ainge (2017). “New Zealand Rive Granted Same Legal Rights as Human Being.” The Guardian, 16 March 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/
mar/16/new-zealand-river-granted-same-legal-rights-as-human-being.
Serres, Michel (1995). The Natural Contract [1990]. Trans. Elizabeth MacArthur and William Paulson. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Stone, Christopher (2010). Should Trees Have Standing? Law, Morality, and the Environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sykes, Katie (2011). “Human Drama, Animal Trials.” Animal Law Review 17.2: 273–312. Timofeeva, Oxana (2018). The History of Animals: A Philosophy. London: Bloomsbury. Timofeeva, Oxana (2013). “Communism with a Nonhuman Face.” e-flux 48 https://www.e-flux.com/journal/48/60030/communism-with-a-nonhuman-face/.
Teubner, Gunther (2006). “Rights of Non-humans?: Electronic Agents and Animals as New Actors in Politics and Law.” Journal of Law and Society 33.4: 497–521. Whitehead, Alfred North (2015). The Concept of Nature [1920]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whitman, Walt (1985). Leaves of Grass. New York: Norton.
Wolfe, Carey (2012). Before the Law: Humans and Other Animals in a Biopolitical Frame. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Published
2020-07-25
How to Cite
ReynaZ. L. (2020). Toward a More Robust New Materialist Politics: How the Practice of Criminal Animal Trials Can Inform Contemporary Politics. Stasis, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.33280/2310-3817-2020-9-1-105-127